The
ECOSTAT Institute of Economic Analysis and Information predicts
that several risk factors will be stronger next year due to
increasing internal and external deficits by the end of 2002.
There is a need for a tight harmonisation of monetary and
fiscal policies in 2003 in order to add dynamism to the economy
while simultaneously keeping inflation under control. The
at times overly strict monetary policy and temporarily relaxed
budgetary policy will obviously converge on one another.
There
are still no signs of any livening in the world economy. The
weak results in the real economy and the simultaneous deterioration
of fiscal conditions have necessitated the application of
sensitive economic policy both in Europe and in the United
States.
The Fed,
fulfilling its role as America's central bank, reacted to
protracted disinflation with an interest rate cut of half
a percentage point. Although there is no inflationary pressure
in the economy -so relaxation of monetary policy is an acceptable
step - this correction of fifty base points exceeded expectations.
In particular it has placed the already weakening exchange
rate of the American dollar at a disadvantage.
The economic
growth of the European Union in the second quarter was up
on the 0.3 percent of the first quarter, expanding by 0.7
percent, but industrial production fell back over the past
year and the rate of slowdown moderated. Inflation remains
above 2 percent, which vindicates the stringent monetary policy
of the European Central Bank. Meanwhile, a smaller fall in
interest rates can be expected before the end of the year
in order to increase demand.
In Hungary
GDP growth of approximately 3.4 percent can be expected in
the third quarter, a moderately rising growth rate. A growth
rate of 3.3 percent is thought probable for 2002 as a whole.
We predict 4 percent growth in added value for 2003 with a
livening of export demand alongside some correction in consumption.
The fluctuation
in industrial production continued through the autumn, and
after 2 percent growth in September, it increased by 11 percent
in October against the same period last year. Exports remained
the key catalyst for growth. We expect a growth dynamic of
around 3 percent for the year as a whole and anticipate a
gradual increase in the dynamism of industrial production
for the year ahead, and predict growth of about 5 percent.
The state
deficit exceeded 800 billion forints in October and could
approach 1500 billion forints by the end of the year, which
represents 8.7 percent of the nominal GDP. The steep rise
in the deficit is partly due to the switch to the ESA95 methodology
and partly to some expenditure being brought forward from
next year to this. Although to this extent the deterioration
in the balance has created a fresh start for next year, it
is perilous from the perspective of foreign capital investment.
At the moment, the various players in the economy still trust
in the planned deficit decrease and thus demand continues
to grow in the state bonds market (although high interest
rates have also had a huge role in that). Nonetheless, a smaller
imbalance will be enough to turn this tendency around next
year for growth in country risk. Consequently, it is essential
to establish fiscal discipline in the coming year, which needs
to be accompanied by greater transparency. The growing deficit,
mostly because of the lower growth rate, could reach 5 percent
of GDP.
The current
balance of payments deficit worsened in September, far more
than expected, and is approaching 2.5 billion Euro. Over the
rest of the year the deficit will further increase and, due
to the increase in the end of year income transfers, will
exceed 3 billion Euro in 2002. As a result of the high import
demand of the Hungarian economy the growth in exports renders
a further deterioration in the balance likely for the year
ahead. In 2003 the deficit, calculated with the methodology
currently in use, could come to 3.5 billion Euro.
The half
percent drop in interest rates from the central bank on the
18th November represented some relaxation in monetary policy.
The regulated interest rate was decreased from 9.5 to 9 percent
in the footsteps of international economic policy. The achievable
interest rate premiums in Hungary grew as a result of falling
interest rates in not only the United States and in European
Union countries, but also in Eastern European countries. The
inflationary target could be held on the strong side of the
band at 11-12 percent off the average, and in consequence
further falls in interest rates could also be possible early
next year.
The consumer
price index in 2002 is expected to be around 5.3 percent.
The interest rate fall will no longer influence this year's
inflation rate significantly. In 2003 we do not anticipate
any strong disinflation. We estimate price increases to stand
at 4.9 percent as an annual average.
Ecostat
Forecast for the Development of the Hungarian Economy
(changes in relation to the previous year, at comparative
prices, as percentages)
|
| Indicators |
2001fact |
2002*prognosis |
2003*
prognosis |
| Gross
domestic product (%) |
3.8 |
3.3 |
4.0 |
| General
(retail) consumption (%) |
4.0 |
6.8 |
3.8 |
| Collective
consumption (%) |
0.4 |
3.5 |
1.7 |
| Fixed
Asset Accumulation (%) |
3.1 |
6.0 |
7.3 |
| Export
(%) |
9.1 |
7.1 |
8.5 |
| Import
(%) |
6.2 |
8.8 |
9.5 |
| Annual
Consumer Price Index (%) |
9.2 |
5.3 |
4.9 |
| Current
Balance of Payments (billion Euro) |
-1.2 |
-3.2 |
-3.5 |
| Direct
capital investment (billion Euro) |
2.3 |
1.5 |
1.7 |
| State
Budget Balance (percentage of GDP)d) |
-4.2 |
-8.7 |
-5.0 |
| Unemployment
Rate (%) a) |
5.7 |
5.9 |
5.6 |
| Gross
Average Income (%) a) |
18.0 |
19.0 |
15.0 |
| Foreign
Trade Balance (billion Euro) |
-3.6 |
-3.8 |
-3.4 |
| Industrial
Production (%) |
4.1 |
2.5 |
5.0 |
| Building
and Construction Industry Performance (%) |
9.9 |
19.0 |
10.0 |
| Retail
Trade Volume (%) |
5.4 |
12.0 |
10.0 |
| Deposit
Rate (fortnightly. MNB) a) |
9.75 |
9.0 |
8.0 |
| One
Year Credit Interest for Ventures a) |
11.2 |
10.3 |
8.6 |
| ECOSTAT
Prosperity Index b) |
47.7 |
50.2 |
|
| ECOSTAT
Property Index c) |
49.2 |
51.1 |
|
|
Source:
Central Statistical Office (KSH), Hungarian National
Bank (MNB), */ Ecostat November forecast
Note:
a) End of year
b)
Quarterly average of the TOP-100, SME and residential
confidence indices, 3rd quarter 2002
c)Property
market prosperity index, 3rd quarter 2002
d)Approximation
of ESA95 methodology |
|